Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Prop cars

We had a short amount of time to make our own prop cars. Fortunately, Kacie has made 2 other cars and knew what to do. She assisted in the formation of the car, the soldering, and the attachments. In the end, we made our car and it was able to go fast.

Monday, May 20, 2013

The Smokey Sorter

Along with our short programming section, we launched ourselves into the capstone project, Marble Sorters! I worked with Kyler Smith, Israel Dedina, Wes Ahrens, and Chase Fischer. We worked a long time on this and eventually came up with a working model that sorted 3 marbles.

We Earned 20 Achievements.

Our Sketches


Organize it!

Brainstorm!

Enter the Matrix
Data Matrix









Design Solution

"I've Made a Few Special Modifications..."

Final Implementation





















Final Implementation - Video!


Reflection
+: We successfully sorted 3 marbles
     We sorted the marbles very quickly
      It was efficient
-: We only were able to sort 3 marbles
   Our funnel/hopper didn't work completely, had to adjust it
    We were unable to drop the marbles from 6 feet
?: Make a larger funnel
    Try to sort more marbles
    Use more fischertecniq products
!: Attempt to use the light sorters
   Make more of an upward facing hopper
   Add a more definite wood/metal marble sorter

Reference:
Our prototype was based off a trash sorter, shown here: reference


--------------------------------------Product Achievements------------------------------------------

Sorting Speed (15 marbles total: at least 3 different types):
Process 15 marbles in less than 2:00 minutes. 
Process 15 marbles in less than 1:45 minutes.
Process 15 marbles in less than 1:30 minutes.
Process 15 marbles in less than 1:15 minutes.
Process 15 marbles in less than 1:00 minute.
Process 15 marbles in less than 45 seconds.
Process 15 marbles in less than 30 seconds.

Marble Delivery (may use non-fischertechnik materials to create a "hopper" to drop marbles into for "Drop" achievements):
Drop marbles from 6" above machine 
Drop marbles from 1' above machine
Drop marbles from 2' above machine

Systems (not including motor or piston used to charge your pressure vessel):
Use at least one motor

Monday, April 8, 2013

Delivery vehicle control

We did the activity on 3.1.7 called delivery vehicle control, where we were to create a system that would transport goods between 2 point, based on an pentameter input. Eventually with some program tweaks, we were able to activate it.








Thursday, March 21, 2013

Programming

We started probably the most basic form of programming this week. We started off with the robopro program on our computers, an interface, an a motor. We told it to start for 3 seconds, then stop. After that advanced to switches and a lamp. On Wednesday, we made the lamp go on, until it had been on for 8 seconds or more. This is a really cool topic.







Basic Programming


Basic Programming


Open Closed Loop System


Open Closed Loop System


Branch Functions


Basic Programming


Flowcharting

Flowcharting

Flowcharting
Variable Functions

Friday, March 1, 2013

Bridge Building Challenge PART 2

The overall goal of the past month and a half or so, was to better our original bridge design, which mine completely failed. So all of the moment calculations, truss calculations, MD solids, beam deflection, and Free body diagrams have been towards the overall goal of building a good, stable bridge.





Wednesday, February 20, 2013

2.1.7 Calculating trusses

We got more practice with trusses today during our block period. We used our 2J=M+R formula to determine if they were statically determinate, then solve for unknown values.







Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Truss Systems

A long and complicated process, truss systems are difficult to comprehend unless you know how to do it. It involves much of the information we have learned in the past, like moments, the use of free body diagrams, and trigonometry.
We had a large packet to complete, but I am only going to upload a few pieces of work:
As you can see, this work was very computational, and is very vague to anyone unfamiliar with the subject. All in all, I think this lesson will help u in our bridge building contest in the end of the lessons











Monday, February 4, 2013

Activities

Lately, mainly on block days, we get lectures about different ideas or themes used in engineering. We have gone though moments, beam deflection, free body diagrams, electrical circuits, and centroids.
I have already talked about centroids in previous posts, so this will not be addressing those.
Moments, free body diagrams, and beam deflection go together. With free body diagrams, we are able to view the forces from different components and how they act upon an object, which relates to beam deflection, which incorporates the knowledge of where the weight is placed, the height off the ground, and the dimensions of the wood. That combines with moments, because moments is really saying the moment of inertia, which includes the dimensions of wood to discover it.
The electrical circuits activity was very difficult to accomplish because it required the use of electrical equipment which could be shot, burnt out, or just not working. Our main objective was to create an electrical circuit that would turn on a light bulb. After we accomplished that, we had to measure the voltage and resistance, then moved onto more intense circuit making.

SEA PEARCH

For a while now, every Monday and Friday, we have been working collaboratively with the NJROTC students in creating the SEA PEARCH submarine. I was placed in a group with Ralph, Wes, Jesse, and myself.
Our group finished relatively early and relaxed and tested the project out. In the end, we had created games that we voted for. The two that won were the sumo wrestling and capture the flag. Our group was in charge of the sumo wrestling ring and the ruled of the game.






Thursday, January 10, 2013

Leadership 101/Dot game

On block day, our class broke up into teams of about 4 or 5 people, each of us electing our own team leader. Then we had a short lecture on leadership, direction, alignment, and commitment. After that we gathered around to demonstrate those traits through a dot game. We would stand in a large triangle, with people being dots, and we had to pass a tennis ball around while being given certain restraints. For example, we had to pass it to everyone, without anyone touching it one time, or not being able to pass it to anyone adjacent to you.

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Centroids!

Centroid are the centers of masses, mostly used in construction of buildings through geometric shapes. Finding the centroid allows engineers to create a safer building, and a stronger one.
We had a worksheet, 2.1.1, and in the worksheet, we were asked to compute multiple centroids of usual geometric shapes, such as rectangles, circles, and triangles.
It was all pretty simple, until there were crazy shapes introduced, like a rectangle with negative space in forms of a semicircle, and a rectangle.
After that we had to create our own centroid both in reality and a virtual one on MDSolids.
MDSolids gives you a very accurate measurements that you enter into the program, as well as the exact placement of the centroid.
Pictures will be added

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Cardboard Canoe Challenge!

I earned 15 Achievements on this challenge!
I worked with Wes, Israel, and Chase for this two week challenge. We worked diligently, smart, and safe. In the end, we had the best canoe in our class, winning almost every challenge.
Achievements:
Design Achievements
1. Design the problem and Brainstorm solutions
     The problem was that we had to build a boat using only cardboard and duct tape
      We needed our boat to be:
  • strong
  • sleek
  • well floating
  • water resistant
  • high walls
  • reinforced structure
  • good wall joints
  • double walled and floored
  • maneuverable
  • covered completely in duct tape\
  • small enough that we don't need to do anything outside of class
  • corners damage resistant and covered well
  • ability to have a person in, completely dry
  • ability to have two people in, completely dry
  • balance
  • large
  • conserve duct tape
  • fast
  • easy to move, not too heavy
  • colorful and artistic
2. Criteria and Constraints
     Our main criteria that we followed in this challenge was the boats ability to cross the pool
     Our main constraint in this challenge was to completely cover the boat in duct tape, well
3. Sketch Ideas



4. Prototype Ideas



5. Select an approach

6. Build It!

7. The Fastest
24.57 seconds is how long it took us to reach the other side, we smoked the other teams by at least 5 seconds, maybe more!
8. The Farthest
We traveled about 250 yards, which is 10 laps, and we could have gone farther, but we had to start the other challenges.
9. The Longest
We were the last team standing, we could have stayed up for at least a half of an hour, but we tested the boats limits and fit 460 pounds in it.
10. Balance Master
We had both Chase and Israel stand up in our boat
11. Videographer
If you want to see the video of our boat, go to Wes's blog at www.ipodman2001.blogspot.com for it. I would upload it here, but he has the iphone 5 and it will not allow me to post it on here from a PC.
12. Feedback
  1. Strong floor really supported our weight well
  2. The front and back walls were well duct taped and remained powerful, even after we had sunk
  3. Our swimmer/pullers really moved quickly and dominated the other teams
  4. The side walls were weak----We should have put on more layers of cardboard, and it would have held for a lot longer
  5. Our vibrant colors really added to our design
  6. We could have duct taped the boat better---ultimately was our slow demise, should have taken more times, maybe at a lunch, to duct tape it better
  7. Our boat design was copied by other teams, but ours worked the best
  8. We had a very hydrodynamic design for gliding through the water
  9. We had a lighter person, Chase, to go in the boat at first, but it could even hold me
  10. We mangled the original box design to create our own formation---We could have made a V-bottom
13. Redesign
    If we were to create another boat, we would most likely use the same design, except with making the walls more stable.

14. Make your own achievement
Our achievement was to have our boat hold over 450 pounds! I think we can call this achievement the "Heavy Loader". We had Wes, Israel and Chase in our boat at the same, and we could have fit more weight if we had enough room! I would approximate our total capacity around 500 pounds.
15. How low did you go?
     We went down only about a suprising 2-3 inches! The unit weight of water in pounds is 1.936 pounds/cubic foot. Chase weighed about 150 pounds. With the math that I did, I divided Chase's weight divided by the unit weight of water, and then divided that by 12, which would give us inches. The final answer is about 6.5 inches, which is pretty close to 3 inches, and it makes sense.

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

West Point Bridge Design

An opportunity to gain some more points to keep my grade up, I saw Mr. Olsen's post about building a West Point Bridge in our program on our computers. After a few different tries of making and adjusting multiple types of bridges, I developed a pretty well supported and stable bridge.

I attempted to keep the price down as much as I could which turned out to be pretty close to $400,000.
I learned a couple of engineering principles from this as well as physics.
After testing and retesting, I realized that the tension of both the compression and tension have to be under 1. I also discovered that the best way to support a bridge is from about with small, triangular piers that alleviate the compression and tension as you go to higher piers.

Monday, September 24, 2012

3rd Annual Mousetrap Racecar Challenge!

We developed, created, tested, reiterated, and retested our small, makeshift cars in this past week.
I was in a group with my classmate, Wes, and we built a sturdy but slow car, not winning any of the speed achievements, but we did win some other significant ones.
We also maintained the criteria and constraints listed under the challenge page on Mr. Olsen's blog.

All together, Wes and I managed to claim 12 achievements.


Our Race car
 


















Achievements:
Design Stage:
1. Brainiac

10 Concepts/Ideas:
*Lightweight
*Speed with Distance
*Small Wheels
*Small Body
*Wind Resistance
*Rubber Wheels
*Straight Shooter
*Strength
*Aerodynamic
*Small use of materials

2. Visualize It

Our first Sketch



















Build Stage:

3. Build It


4. The Price of Glory

The least we could do is $17 because we used
4 wheels, 3 holds, 1 mousetrap, 1 string, 4 Bars, 2 Axles, and 2 Blocks

Test Stage:

5. The Distance Event

6. Acceleration Event

7. Competitor

8. Feedback
+: It was sturdy, and it moved
Change: Could have used less materials to create our car
?: What would be a good way to change our car to make it faster/travel farther?
!: Make a more aerodynamic car, perhaps with shorter axles
9. Rework
10. Game Changer
*I think that adding a new rule that all axles have to be used. There was a constraint that we had to use two axles, but it did not say that we had to make use of them. My new rule would be to make both of the axles on the ground, and not like an axle on the ground then one just hanging in the air.
11. Name it
*I would change the Led Foot Challenge name to "If you're not first, you're last".
12. Leave it cleaner than you found it
*Wes and I dissasembled out cars completely, even if we found some of the parts already assembled, we also kept any trash off of our desk and placed it in the trash can.